Identification

Title

Collaborative deer management - ecology data, 2006-2009

Abstract

This dataset consists of a survey of the vegetational impacts of deer in 20 forests as part of the NERC Rural Economy and Land Use (RELU) programme. It is widely accepted, at least in principle, that most kinds of natural resources are best handled collaboratively. Collaborative management avoids conflict and enhances the efficiency with which the resource is managed. However, simply knowing that collaboration is a good idea does not guarantee that collaboration can be achieved. In this project, the researchers have addressed issues of conflict and collaboration in ecological resource management using the example of wild deer in Britain. Deer are an excellent example since they highlight problems around ownership and because they offer both societal benefits and drawbacks. Wild deer are not owned, though the land they occupy is. As deer move around, they usually cross ownership boundaries and thus provoke potential conflicts between neighbouring owners who have differing management goals. Deer themselves are valued and a key component of the natural environment, but their feeding commonly limits or prevents woodland regeneration and can thus be harmful to ecological quality. Deer provide jobs but they also provoke traffic accidents. This study used a variety of methods from across the natural and social sciences, including choice experiments, semi-structured interviews with individuals and focus groups. It also incorporated the use of participatory GIS to map deer distributions and habitat preferences in conjunction with stakeholders. The study confirmed conventional wisdom about the importance of collaboration. However, it also showed that there were many barriers to achieving effective collaboration in practice, such as contrasting objectives, complex governance arrangements, power imbalances and personal relationships. Mechanisms for enhancing collaboration, such as incentives and incorporating deer within broader landscape management objectives, were examined. Though these proposals were worked out for the case of deer, they are likely to be applicable much more widely and should be considered in other cases of disputed or rapidly changing ecological resource management. This dataset consists of a survey of the vegetational impacts of deer in 20 forests. The interview and focus group transcripts, and the choice experiment datasets from this study are available at the UK Data Archive under study number 6545 (see online resources). Further documentation for this study may be found through the RELU Knowledge Portal and the project's ESRC funding award web page (see online resources).

Resource type

dataset

Resource locator

https://beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk/datacatalogue/studies/study?id=6545

name: UK Data Service catalogue record

function: information

http://relu.data-archive.ac.uk/explore-data/search-browse/Project/?ID=RES-227-25-0014

name: RELU Knowledge Portal page

function: information

https://eidc.ac.uk/contactus

name: Contact the EIDC for access to this data

function: download

Unique resource identifier

code

1297098008280

codeSpace

CEH:EIDC:

Dataset language

eng

Spatial reference system

code identifying the spatial reference system

Classification of spatial data and services

Topic category

biota

economy

environment

Keywords

Keyword set

keyword value

Land Use

originating controlled vocabulary

title

GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0

reference date

date type

publication

effective date

2008-06-01

Keyword set

keyword value

originating controlled vocabulary

title

GeoNames

reference date

date type

creation

effective date

2006-01-01

Keyword set

keyword value

Rural Economy and Land Use Programme

Collaborative Deer Management

Balquhidder

Cairngorm (mountains)

Poole basin

Conflict

Cooperation

Deer (farmed)

Environmental conservation

Environmental management

Geographic information systems

Land management

Participation

Resources management

Rural areas

Rural development

Rural economics

Rural environment

Rural planning

Social conflict

Stakeholders

2006-2009

Geographic location

West bounding longitude

-6.58

East bounding longitude

4.09

North bounding latitude

55.94

South bounding latitude

49.05

Temporal reference

Temporal extent

Begin position

End position

Dataset reference date

date type

publication

effective date

2008-09-18

Frequency of update

notPlanned

Quality and validity

Lineage

Research funded by Economic and Social Research Council, Natural Environment Research Council and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council. Award Number: RES-224-26-0041 The vegetational impact data consists of measurements of ecological indicators including physical damage, diversity and density, further details of which can be found in the documentation the data files. Detailed information on the sampling methods used are currently not available.

Conformity

Conformity report

specification

title

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services

reference date

date type

publication

effective date

2010-12-08

degree

explanation

Data format

name of format

Microsoft Excel

version of format

Constraints related to access and use

Constraint set

Limitations on public access

Constraint set

Limitations on public access

Responsible organisations

Responsible party

organisation name

Macaulay Institute

email address

j.irvine@macaulay.ac.uk

responsible party role

principalInvestigator

Responsible party

organisation name

University of York

email address

piran.white@york.ac.uk

responsible party role

pointOfContact

Responsible party

organisation name

Macaulay Institute

email address

j.irvine@macaulay.ac.uk

responsible party role

owner

Responsible party

organisation name

University of York

email address

piran.white@york.ac.uk

responsible party role

owner

Responsible party

organisation name

Forest Research

email address

robin.gill@forestry.gsi.gov.uk

responsible party role

owner

Responsible party

organisation name

Forest Research

email address

norman.dandy@forestry.gsi.gov.uk

responsible party role

owner

Responsible party

organisation name

NERC Environmental Information Data Centre

email address

info@eidc.ac.uk

responsible party role

publisher

Metadata on metadata

Metadata point of contact

organisation name

Environmental Information Data Centre

full postal address

Lancaster Environment Centre, Library Avenue, Bailrigg

Lancaster

LA1 4AP

UK

email address

info@eidc.ac.uk

responsible party role

pointOfContact

Metadata date

2021-06-25T18:42:55

Metadata language

eng